<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Impressions: gOS &#8216;Gadgets&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/08/14/first-impressions-gos-gadgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/08/14/first-impressions-gos-gadgets/</link>
	<description>Gaming, Technology, and Gadget News, Reviews, and Previews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SmellyGeekBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/08/14/first-impressions-gos-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-6252</link>
		<dc:creator>SmellyGeekBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=1944#comment-6252</guid>
		<description>It just seems odd to me that it gives &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt; enough freedom to make it look how you want, but then omits a few simple options (colour settings, button placement) that other distros do have. I totally agree in the &quot;all or nothing&quot; approach, but gOS seems to be partway between.

I have to agree though that gOS shows a lot of promise, and it really is shaping up to be perfect for netbooks and more technophobic users. 

That said, as a slightly more experienced Linux user I personally like a little more freedom. I did start the review with &lt;em&gt;&quot;...here are some of the thoughts I have about gOS from the point of view of a long-time Linux user and enthusiast.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; after all.

Each to their own anyway. Thanks for your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just seems odd to me that it gives <em>almost</em> enough freedom to make it look how you want, but then omits a few simple options (colour settings, button placement) that other distros do have. I totally agree in the &#8220;all or nothing&#8221; approach, but gOS seems to be partway between.</p>
<p>I have to agree though that gOS shows a lot of promise, and it really is shaping up to be perfect for netbooks and more technophobic users. </p>
<p>That said, as a slightly more experienced Linux user I personally like a little more freedom. I did start the review with <em>&#8220;&#8230;here are some of the thoughts I have about gOS from the point of view of a long-time Linux user and enthusiast.&#8221;</em> after all.</p>
<p>Each to their own anyway. Thanks for your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/08/14/first-impressions-gos-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-6251</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=1944#comment-6251</guid>
		<description>gOS is clearly intended for people that want a system that just &quot;works &quot;without the complexity of a system with features not used or without too many choices (causing confusion).  Ever tried to set up a system for a grandparent or elderly parent and you&#039;ll know exactly what I mean! I don&#039;t like getting calls saying they &quot;lost&quot; their movable button/toolbar because they dragged it off the screen and it &quot;disappeared&quot;!

If you want to &quot;tinker&quot; with a system get one of the other distros for heavens sake! I look forward to reading a review of a major Linux distro where the reviewer actually criticizes the distro for having to edit config files to get it to work rather than seeing it as a major problem or thinking that it is a feature that the average non-IT graduate user wants (they just want it to work out of the box!) 

I like the direction gOS is taking - its been a long time coming (and I hope there are other Linux distros in the making that take a similar approach to target specific audiences rather than a one size fits all approach - like scarily Windows!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gOS is clearly intended for people that want a system that just &#8220;works &#8220;without the complexity of a system with features not used or without too many choices (causing confusion).  Ever tried to set up a system for a grandparent or elderly parent and you&#8217;ll know exactly what I mean! I don&#8217;t like getting calls saying they &#8220;lost&#8221; their movable button/toolbar because they dragged it off the screen and it &#8220;disappeared&#8221;!</p>
<p>If you want to &#8220;tinker&#8221; with a system get one of the other distros for heavens sake! I look forward to reading a review of a major Linux distro where the reviewer actually criticizes the distro for having to edit config files to get it to work rather than seeing it as a major problem or thinking that it is a feature that the average non-IT graduate user wants (they just want it to work out of the box!) </p>
<p>I like the direction gOS is taking &#8211; its been a long time coming (and I hope there are other Linux distros in the making that take a similar approach to target specific audiences rather than a one size fits all approach &#8211; like scarily Windows!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmellyGeekBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/08/14/first-impressions-gos-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-5491</link>
		<dc:creator>SmellyGeekBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=1944#comment-5491</guid>
		<description>My overall impresssion was really very good. If it were a few years back, it&#039;d be classed as one of the better distros out there. Unfortunately (for gOS), Linux has come a long way in the past few years and users now expect a minimum standard of performance and polish which the Gadgets beta doesn&#039;t seem to have.

That said, please do bear in mind that it is still a beta and that I fully expect these issues to be fixed in the official release!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My overall impresssion was really very good. If it were a few years back, it&#8217;d be classed as one of the better distros out there. Unfortunately (for gOS), Linux has come a long way in the past few years and users now expect a minimum standard of performance and polish which the Gadgets beta doesn&#8217;t seem to have.</p>
<p>That said, please do bear in mind that it is still a beta and that I fully expect these issues to be fixed in the official release!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Eberhart</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/08/14/first-impressions-gos-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-5490</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Eberhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=1944#comment-5490</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review.  I was wondering what that gOS would be like, and I figured that it would be somewhat easy to install and all being that it is based on Ubuntu.  What I wasn&#039;t sure about is whether the gadgetry added any sort of significant value above and beyond the base Ubuntu (or, heck, OpenSUSE or anything along these lines).  I&#039;m getting the feel I will wait for the full production version (versus Beta) and then at least try it out for kicks.   Appreciate hearing your experiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review.  I was wondering what that gOS would be like, and I figured that it would be somewhat easy to install and all being that it is based on Ubuntu.  What I wasn&#8217;t sure about is whether the gadgetry added any sort of significant value above and beyond the base Ubuntu (or, heck, OpenSUSE or anything along these lines).  I&#8217;m getting the feel I will wait for the full production version (versus Beta) and then at least try it out for kicks.   Appreciate hearing your experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
