<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Sins Of A Solar Empire&#8217; Shows &#8216;Spore&#8217; How It Should Be Done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/</link>
	<description>Gaming, Technology, and Gadget News, Reviews, and Previews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Starkitty9000</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/comment-page-1/#comment-10767</link>
		<dc:creator>Starkitty9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=2474#comment-10767</guid>
		<description>Bullcrap, seriously.  

All of my friends and myself LAN Sins of a Solar Empire all the time.  All of us have paid for, and bought, the game, because we love the game and we love Stardock for treating us well.   Nobody that I know in-person has pirated that game, although I know a few people online who say they  have. 

On the other hand, those people I know who&#039;ve played Spore, have pirated it.   Nobody wants to buy it, because nobody I know ok with the SecureROM crap. 

Sins is worth my 40 bucks, both because it&#039;s good, and to support Stardock, because Stardock rocks.  

Also, considering the money-wasting and inefficiency at EA, I wouldn&#039;t be suprised if, after all the grosses and expenditures are counted, Stardock still walks away with more profits from Sins than EA ever will with Spore.    Gross market share doesn&#039;t mean anything if your development-cost/intake ratio sucks.   Nintendo has proved that in every single console cycle, and Stardock is similarly displaying a philosophy of low-development-cost/high-quality gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullcrap, seriously.  </p>
<p>All of my friends and myself LAN Sins of a Solar Empire all the time.  All of us have paid for, and bought, the game, because we love the game and we love Stardock for treating us well.   Nobody that I know in-person has pirated that game, although I know a few people online who say they  have. </p>
<p>On the other hand, those people I know who&#8217;ve played Spore, have pirated it.   Nobody wants to buy it, because nobody I know ok with the SecureROM crap. </p>
<p>Sins is worth my 40 bucks, both because it&#8217;s good, and to support Stardock, because Stardock rocks.  </p>
<p>Also, considering the money-wasting and inefficiency at EA, I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised if, after all the grosses and expenditures are counted, Stardock still walks away with more profits from Sins than EA ever will with Spore.    Gross market share doesn&#8217;t mean anything if your development-cost/intake ratio sucks.   Nintendo has proved that in every single console cycle, and Stardock is similarly displaying a philosophy of low-development-cost/high-quality gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogLESS : Evolving Beyond DRM&#8211; Part Two</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/comment-page-1/#comment-9381</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogLESS : Evolving Beyond DRM&#8211; Part Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=2474#comment-9381</guid>
		<description>[...] a big name publisher. It didn’t receive a lot of advertising. It’s just a really good game that made a lot of money—with no DRM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big name publisher. It didn’t receive a lot of advertising. It’s just a really good game that made a lot of money—with no DRM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmellyGeekBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/comment-page-1/#comment-7741</link>
		<dc:creator>SmellyGeekBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=2474#comment-7741</guid>
		<description>[citation needed]

Also, if you read the story you&#039;d see that there is no &quot;bitching&quot; or indeed affecting of anyone&#039;s life going on. I&#039;m merely reporting on popular opinion, and making an (I thought) interesting comparison between the two companies&#039; differing DRM policy. 

You say that Sins is available by torrent, hinting that it&#039;s lack of DRM makes it freely available, but you also go on to contradict yourself by adding that Spore is also available on torrent sites (even though &quot;most people&quot; bought it).

Did you buy Spore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[citation needed]</p>
<p>Also, if you read the story you&#8217;d see that there is no &#8220;bitching&#8221; or indeed affecting of anyone&#8217;s life going on. I&#8217;m merely reporting on popular opinion, and making an (I thought) interesting comparison between the two companies&#8217; differing DRM policy. </p>
<p>You say that Sins is available by torrent, hinting that it&#8217;s lack of DRM makes it freely available, but you also go on to contradict yourself by adding that Spore is also available on torrent sites (even though &#8220;most people&#8221; bought it).</p>
<p>Did you buy Spore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fail</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/comment-page-1/#comment-7734</link>
		<dc:creator>fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=2474#comment-7734</guid>
		<description>ITT: Bitching

I haven&#039;t met a single person that has SINS that hasn&#039;t downloaded it off a torrent, yet most Spore owners have the retail version.

Sins might have sold 500k units since february, i&#039;m guessing Spore will have sold that by the end of next month or this one.

Seriously get over it...You can download it off a torrent page if DRM is affecting your life so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITT: Bitching</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t met a single person that has SINS that hasn&#8217;t downloaded it off a torrent, yet most Spore owners have the retail version.</p>
<p>Sins might have sold 500k units since february, i&#8217;m guessing Spore will have sold that by the end of next month or this one.</p>
<p>Seriously get over it&#8230;You can download it off a torrent page if DRM is affecting your life so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludov</title>
		<link>http://www.teamteabag.com/2008/09/09/sins-of-a-solar-empire-shows-spore-how-it-should-be-done/comment-page-1/#comment-7270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teamteabag.com/?p=2474#comment-7270</guid>
		<description>&quot;The result? The little-known RTS from the even littler-known publisher has sold over 500,000 copies since its release in February. Considering the game cost less than $1 million to develop, I’d say that their strategy paid off.&quot;

Seriously, just imagining what the 10 years of development behind Spore must have cost, I merely cannot help but laughs reading this one. Seriously, Stardock is pure win compared to EA in this case :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The result? The little-known RTS from the even littler-known publisher has sold over 500,000 copies since its release in February. Considering the game cost less than $1 million to develop, I’d say that their strategy paid off.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously, just imagining what the 10 years of development behind Spore must have cost, I merely cannot help but laughs reading this one. Seriously, Stardock is pure win compared to EA in this case <img src='http://www.teamteabag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
